The High Court allowed the civil application and restored the writ petition to the file, disposing of the application.
The civil application allowed; the writ petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 904) caw1785-19.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1785 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4751 OF 2019
Vijay s/o. Shivram Pathare ..Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra& Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr.Nitin V. Gaware i/b. Vivekanand Tadke for the applicant.
Mr.S..L. Babar, AGP for respondent-State.
Mr.Amit Karle with Ms.Gauri Joshi i/s. S.K. Legal Associates LLP for respondent No.5.
CORAM: NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JULY 30, 2019
P.C. :-
For the reasons disclosed in the application, the
application stands allowed. The writ petition is restored to the file.
( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. )
Vijay s/o. Shivram Pathare
The State of Maharashtra
Ors.
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
