The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking interest on leave encashment delayed due to internal disputes between trust respondents. The court held that the petitioner (Head Master) must ensure document submission, and the State Government is not liable for the delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) WP 8559-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
WRIT PETITION NO. 8559 OF 2013 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1293 OF 2019
Ramchandra Bandu Kshirsagar .. Petitioner Vs. Krishnamai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Dhamner through President & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Sachin Chavan for the Petitioner. Mr. K. J. Phakade for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 to 5.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 11th JUNE, 2019.
P. C. :
processed and a sum of ₹ 1,00,040/- was paid to him on 13.12.2012.
The claim in the Writ Petition filed in the year 2013 is to pay interest to
him @ 12% per annum for the period 01.03.2002 till 13.12.2012.
1/3
(1) WP 8559-13
to be paid to the Petitioner for the belated leave encashment payment made to him.
2/3
(1) WP 8559-13
[N. M. JAMDAR, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
3/3
3 issues framed by the court
Whether interest should be awarded on leave encashment paid belatedly due to internal management dispute between trust respondents.
Whether liability for delay in leave encashment can be fastened on the State Government.
Whether the Head Master should have ensured submission of requisite documents to avoid delay.
Amk Ramchandra Bandu Kshirsagar
Krishnamai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Dhamner
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
