Single judge order allowing a civil application to bring legal heirs of respondent no. 2 on record after condoning a 39-day delay as bona fide.
Application allowed on merits; notice issued to legal representatives of respondent no. 2 returnable on 30/09/2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ISM
1 14.1030.17 caw.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1030 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10718 OF 2016
The State of Maharashtra and others .....Applicants
V/s.
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
The State of Maharashtra and others …..Applicants
V/s.
Shri. Gundu Vishnu Chandam and others …..Respondents
Mr. S. H. Kankal for the applicants
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : JULY 24, 2019.
P.C.
Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
2 14.1030.17 caw.doc
4 The delay caused appears to be bonafide. Hence, same stands condoned.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 39-day delay in moving the application is bona fide and accordingly condonable.
The State of Maharashtra and others
Shri. Gundu Vishnu Chandam and others
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
