Disposed
Reliance India Power Fund v. Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd. and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCCARBP/514/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
147 OF 2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
937 CARBPL 147 OF 2019.doc
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.147 OF 2019
Reliance India Power Fund …Petitioner
versus
…
Su Kam Power Systems Ltd. & Ors. Respondents
Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pulkit Sharma, Mr. Sidharth
Srivastava, Mr. Sachin Sharma I/by Link Legal India Law Services, for Petitioner.
Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Senior Advocate with Mr. Salonee Kulkarni I/by Shardul
Amarchand Mangaldas and Co., for Respondent No.1.
Ms. Mayura Maru, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 1st APRIL, 2019
P.C.:
1. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for Respondent No.1 states that the
two trade marks are an asset of Respondent No.1 – Company and shall continue to be
so in the liquidation proceedings. The statement is accepted.
2.The learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 states that even if the Delhi
High Court vacates its earlier order dated 12th October, 2018, they shall not deal with
the subject trade marks without seeking prior permission of this Court. In view
thereof, the above Petition is disposed of. Liberty to apply.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
Reliance India Power Fund
Su Kam Power Systems Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court