Disposed

Ms. Hritu Ramesh Dudani (Now Mrs. Hritu Noel Smith) v. Shri. Ramesh K. Dudani

Bombay HC7 Mar 2019CAM/359/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay directed the registry to release Rs. 10 Lakhs fixed deposit and accumulated interest, held in the name of the Applicant, who was the mother, to her marital name without objection from the Respondent father.

What did the court decide?

Directed the registry to release Rs. 10 Lakhs FD and accumulated interest to Mrs. Hritu Noel Smith in her marital name.

Ms. Hritu Ramesh Dudani (Now Mrs. Hritu Noel… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

18 - CAM. 359-18

¶2

VPH

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION No. 359 OF 2018 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL No. 121 OF 2004

¶5

Ms. Hritu Ramesh Dudani (now, Hritu Noel Smith) … Applicant Vs. Ramesh K. Dudani … Respondent

¶6

¶7

Mr. Amit Bhwmik with Sagar P. Batavia, for the Applicant. Mrs. Shilpa Joshi, for the Respondent.

¶8

¶9

CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY, & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : MARCH 7, 2019

¶10

PC :

¶11

This application arising out of Family Court Appeal No.

¶12

121 of 2004 has been made by Mrs. Hritu Noel Smith seeking a direction to the registry of this Court to release the amount of Rs.10 Lacs, deposited in her name by the Respondent-father, together with the accumulated interest thereon. Pursuant to the direction dated 1^st March, 2019, the registry has submitted a following note:

¶13

1 / 2

¶14

18 - CAM. 359-18

¶15

“Shri Ramesh K. Dudani, Respondent has deposited an amount of Rs.30,00,000/- on 23^rd December, 2014 (statement enclosed) and as per submission dated 22/12/2014 a seal packet (5 of 2015) has been received from Decree Department (FCA Section) containing FDR Receipt No. 18429, amounting to Rs.10,00,000/- deposited by the Respondent in FCA 121 of 2004.”

¶16

The learned counsel for the Applicant has tendered a copy of the fixed deposit receipt, bearing Sr. No. 18429, which is mentioned in the office note submitted by the registry. The office note tendered by the registry, as also the copy of the fixed deposit receipt tendered by the learned counsel for the Applicant, are taken on record and marked “X” (colly) for identification. Since both, the original Appellant as well as the Respondent has no objection, we direct the registry to release the said amount of Rs. 10 lakhs, kept in the fixed deposit together with the accumulated interest thereon, in favour of the Applicant in her marital name i.e. Mrs. Hritu Noel Smith. Civil application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶17

Sd/Sd/- [SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.]

¶18

Vinayak Halemath

¶19

2 / 2

Ms. Hritu Ramesh Dudani (Now Mrs. Hritu Noel Smith) v. Shri. Ramesh K. Dudani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms. Hritu Ramesh Dudani (Now Mrs. Hritu Noel Smith) v. Shri. Ramesh K. Dudani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sabestian Francis Almeida Vs State of Maharashtra through Office of Govt Pleader and Ors.

Mulchand Shah Vs the Dy. Registrar, Co-Op. Soc. , 'P' Ward, Kandivali E Mumbai and Ors.

Mr.Sachin Kisan Ganjale Vs Mrs.Sadhana Sachin Ganjale

R.N.Koppikar,I.O.Ncb,Bombay. Vs Bakul Nemchand Shah and 2 Ors.

Mumbai Depositors and Finance Brokers Association through Sham Gopaldas Ahuja Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mumbai Depositors and Finance Brokers Association through Sham Gopaldas Ahuja Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.