Allowed

V.I.D.C. through Executive Engineer, Canal Division Bembla Project, Yavatmal and Another v. Mr. Bandu Narayan Piprade and Others

Bombay HC26 Mar 2019CAF/3417/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, allowed a civil application condoning a 391-day delay in filing an appeal. The Civil Application No. 3418 of 2018 prayed for a stay on the execution of an impugned order, which was granted based on counsel's submission that compensation had been deposited.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 391-day delay; Impugned order dated 30/07/2016 is stayed until further orders.

V.I.D.C. through Executive Engineer, Canal… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 933 caf3417.18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3417 OF 2018 IN

¶4

FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 3650 OF 2018

¶5

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, thr. its Executive Engineer, Canal Division Bembla

¶6

Project, Yavatmal and another.

¶7

..VS..

¶8

Mr. Bandu Narayan Piprade and others.

¶9

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶10

¶11

Shri M.A. Kadu, counsel for the applicants/ appellants.

¶12

Ms H.N. Jaipurkar, AGP for the non-applicant/respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

¶13

CORAM : ARUN D. UPADHYE, J. DATED : 26/03/2019

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

Perused the application. There is delay of 391 days

¶16

in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. Civil application is allowed.

¶17

FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 3650/2018.

¶18

Heard.

¶19

Admit.

¶20

Call for record and proceedings.

¶21

Ms H.N. Jaipurkar, learned AGP waives service of

¶22

notice for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

¶23

Appellants to file private paper book within six

¶24

months.

¶25

2 933 caf3417.18

¶26

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3418 OF 2018.

¶27

Heard learned counsel for the applicants/ appellants.

¶28

Learned counsel for the applicants/ appellants has submitted that amount of compensation has already deposited in this Court and prays that the execution of impugned order be stayed.

¶29

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicants/appellants, the impugned order dated 30/07/2016 passed by the 2^nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal in L.A.C. No. 309/2013 is hereby stayed, until further order.

¶30

JUDGE

¶31

rkn

V.I.D.C. through Executive Engineer, Canal Division Bembla Project, Yavatmal and Another v. Mr. Bandu Narayan Piprade and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.I.D.C. through Executive Engineer, Canal Division Bembla Project, Yavatmal and Another v. Mr. Bandu Narayan Piprade and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.I.D.C. through Executive Engineer, Bembla Project, Awadhootwadi, Yavatmal and Another Vs Sudhakar Keshao Raut and Others

Executive Engineer, Bembla Project, Yavatmal Vs Kailash S/O Shankar Gawande and Others

Mah.Industrial Devp.Corp.Amt. Vs Rajkumar Vidyaratan Wadte and 6 Ors.

The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal Vs Mahadeo Shyamrao Dhole (Dead) through Lrs. Prabhakar Mahadeo Dhole and Others

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr. Exe. Legal, Nagpur Divisional Office, Nagpur Vs Smt. Pratibha Panditrao Solanke and Others

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Yavatmal Project Construction and Another Vs Babusingh Narsingh Chavan and Others