The Bombay High Court allowed an application by legal heirs for condonation of delay in filing a first appeal challenging a City Civil Court judgment, permitting service of notice via RPAD or hand delivery.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-cast-25542-2015.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION (ST)NO.25542/2015 IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.25541/2015
| Office Notes, |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| Office Memoranda | |
| of Coram, |
|
| Appearances, | |
| court’s orders or | |
| directions and |
|
| Registrar’s orders |
Advocate Mr.M.J.Sharma for applicant.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J DATE : AUGUST 5, 2019.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for applicant. At his request, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.
Chitra Sonawane
1/2
16-cast-25542-2015.doc
applicant and the averments made in civil application, I am satisfied that applicant has made out a case for following order.
a) Rule
b) Rule made returnable on 20.9.2019. c) In addition to usual mode of service, the applicant is permitted to serve the respondents by private notice either by RPAD and/or hand delivery and file affidavit of service to that effect, on or before next date.
Chitra Sonawane
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant has made out a case for condonation of delay in filing the first appeal.
Legal Heirs of the Deceased/Defendant
Unknown Respondents
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
