The High Court of Bombay allowed the withdrawal of a Civil Revision Application and disposed of the same. Subsequently connected applications for condonation of delay and vacating stay were also disposed of with permission for withdrawal.
The C.R.A. is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. Connected civil applications are also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-cra-st-6466-2017.odt
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.6466 OF 2017
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2017
Creative Unit Pvt. Ltd. ] Applicant Vs. Sudhir Bahl and others. ] Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.97 OF 2018 Sudhir Bahl ] Applicant Vs. Creative Unit Pvt. Ltd and others. ] Respondents
Mr. Ashish Suryawanshi, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. Deepak Lad i/b Advani & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms.Rhia Mehta i/b Vashi & Vashi, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 3rd MAY, 2019.
P.C.
Heard Mr. Suryawanshi, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Lad, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 and Ms. Mehta, learned Counsel for respondent No.2.
1 of 2
901-cra-st-6466-2017.odt
taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Mr. Suryawanshi states that the applicant has handed over possession of the suit premises to the first respondent. Mr. Lad confirms the said fact. Mr. Suryawanshi seeks permission to withdraw the C.R.A. Mr. Lad and Ms. Mehta have no objection.
2 of 2
Creative Unit Pvt. Ltd.
Sudhir Bahl
R.G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
