Single-line order discharging a previous conditional order regarding land acquisition compensation payment. The court held that since the amount was not deposited as per the earlier order dated 13.08.2018, the stay is deemed vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
36 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9095 OF 2018 IN FA/1890/2019 WITH CA/9097/2018 IN FA/1891/2019 WITH CA/9099/2018 IN FA/1892/2019
EX. ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT STRENGTHENING DIV. OMERGA THR M.K.V.D.C. PUNE AND ORS
VERSUS
MAHADU TAKUR LAMAN (RATHOD) DIED THR LRS BABURAO AND ORS
Mr. A.S. Shelke, Advocate for the applicant No.1
Mr. L.C. Patil, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 to 8
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2019
PER COURT :
directed the acquiring body to deposit the amount. It was also stated that in
case of failure to abide by the duration of that conditional order, then it
would be treated that the stay is vacated. If the amount is not deposited the
said stay stood vacated. Under such circumstance, the application stands
disposed of.
( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )
agd
Ex. Engineer, Irrigation Project Strengthening Div. Omerga Thr M.K.V.D.C. Pune and Ors.
Mahadhu Takur Laman (Rathod) Died Thr Lrs Baburao and Ors.
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
