Disposed

The Zilla Parishad Beed the Chief Executive Officer v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC21 Jun 2019CA/7077/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This review application addressed a dispute regarding the accommodation of transferred teachers where the applicant allegedly created the anomalous situation. The court noted prior directions to resolve the issue and dispose of the review applications without costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil applications and review applications disposed of without costs.

The Zilla Parishad Beed the Chief Executive Officer Vs… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

DB907

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7077 OF 2019

¶4

IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO.18054/2019

¶5

THE ZILLA PARISHAD BEED THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH

¶8

911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7109 OF 2019
IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO.18068/2019

¶9

THE ZILLA PARISHAD BEED THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶12

...

¶13

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Nirmal Ramchandra J.
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. K. B. Jadhavar
Advocate for Respondents/petitioner : Mr.S S Thombre

¶14

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.
 DATE:21st June, 2019

¶15

PER COURT :

¶16

1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. For

¶17

the reasons stated in the application, delay caused

¶18

in filing review applications is condoned. Civil
applications disposed of.

¶19

2. We have considered the review applications on

¶20

merits. We have heard Mr.Nirmal, learned counsel for

¶21

the applicant. In fact, the present situation is a
creation of the applicant only. Upon the no objection

¶22

given by the applicant, the Zilla Parishads, where the

¶23

1/2

¶24

DB907

¶25

non applicant employees were serving, relieved them to
join with Z. P. Beed. Now the Z.P. Beed contends that
there are excess teacher and they cannot be
accommodated.

¶26

3. The anomalous situation is the creation of the

¶27

present applicant only. We had considered the said
aspect and directed the applicant to allow the
petitioners to work at their transferred places and
if at all at the place of transfer no posts are
available, then at any other place in Zilla Parishad
Pariahds Beed. We had also directed the State
Government to take effective steps to resolve these
anomalous situation and we had allowed the petitioners
to join duties subject to the decision that would be
taken by the Government. Now it is for the State to

¶28

step in to resolve the dispute.

¶29

4. The review applications are accordingly disposed
of. No costs.

¶30

(A. M.DHAVALE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)

¶31

JPC

¶32

2/2

The Zilla Parishad Beed the Chief Executive Officer v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Zilla Parishad Beed the Chief Executive Officer v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar through Its Chief Executive Officer Vs Ajinkya Sharad Govekar

Dipak Gangadharrao Sul Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Bahu Sevabhavi Sanstha Soyegaon Dist Aurangabad Thru President M B Jain Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mahendra Dattatraya Nikalje Vs the Zonal Manager Appellate Authoritiy Life Insurance Corporation of India and Others

Varsha Vasant Mhetre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The Union of India and Others Vs Sahakar Maharshi Bhausaheb Thorat Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Smrutnagar Dist Ahmednagar