The State of Maharashtra and Another v. Vikrant Rupendra Kale and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
(( 1 )) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.A. No.3779/2017
(( 1 ))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3779 OF 2017 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGIATION NO.133 OF 2016
The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... APPLICANTS
VERSUS
Vikrant Rupendra Kale & ors. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for applicant – State Shri A.B. Kale, Advocate for original petitioner Shri S.B. Deshpande, A.S.G. for R.No.1 to 3 in P.I.L. Shri B.R. Surwase, Advocate for R.No.8 & 9 in P.I.L.
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ. DATED : 1st AUGUST, 2019.
ORAL ORDER :
The present application was filed with a prayer for dispensing with the personal appearance of the Government official. The concerned Government official was called upon to attend this Court on the backdrop of the fact that in spite of opportunities granted to the State Government, affidavit-in-reply was not filed within reasonable period. The learned Government Pleader submits before this Court that the affidavit-in-reply is filed on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3, 4, 7 and 9 through
C.A. No.3779/2017
(( 2 ))
Ms Alka Ahirrao, Superintending Engineer, Administrator of Command Area Development Authority, Ahmednagar. As the affidavit-in-reply is filed in the petition, the learned Government Pleader submits that, the petition would be contested by the State on merits, as well with reference to the affidavit-in-reply filed in this Court.
(R.G. AVACHAT) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/-
State of Maharashtra
Vikrant Rupendra Kale
Prashanna B. Varale
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court