Disposed
Sanjay Kachru Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCA/2278/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) ca2278.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2278 OF 2019
IN WP/8615/2017
SANJAY KACHRU PAWAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Ms.Kalyani Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr.P.R.Patil,
Advocate for the applicant
Mr.S.B.Deshpande, ASG for Union of India
Mr.A.R.Kale, AGP for the respondents/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :08.02.2019
P.C. :-
.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and
learned AGP for the respondents/State.
2.Learned counsel invited our attention to
the grounds stated in the application permitting the
applicant/petitioner to seek amendment in the
petition.
3.In view of the submissions of the learned
counsel for the applicant/petitioner and for the
reasons stated in the application, the application
is allowed in terms of prayer clause-A. Necessary
amendment be carried out within one week.
4.Learnedcounselforthe
applicant/petitioner to provide the amended copy to
the learned counsel appearing for the parties within
one week.
5.The respondents if are willing may file
their reply within two weeks thereafter.
6.Postthepetitionforfurther
consideration, admission and disposal on 22.03.2019.
7.Withthesedirections,thecivil
application is disposed of.
VishalK/ ca2278.19
SANJAY KACHRU PAWAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
PRASANNA B. VARALE
S.M.GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court