The High Court held the civil application not maintainable. Applicants may seek appropriate remedy if directions in the referenced PIL are not followed. The application is disposed of.
The civil application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-ca.1903-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1903 OF 2019 IN PIL/12/2015
SHAIKH SAMEER RASHID AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.N.K.Tungar, Advocate for applicants
Mr.S.Y.Mahajan, Addl. G.P. for State
Mr.S.S.Dande, Advocate for respondent no.6
Mr.A.Y.Pandule, Advocate for respondent no.9
Mr.V.D.Salunke, Advocate for respondent nos.10 to 15
Mr.Swapnil Joshi, Advocate for respondent nos.18 to 23
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 01, 2019
PER COURT
In our opinion, the application in the present
form is not maintenable. In case the directions given
in Public Interest Litigation No.12 of 2015 (Shaikh
Sameer Rashid and anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and
ors.) are not followed, it would be open for the
applicants i.e. original petitioners, to avail of
2 9-ca.1903-19
appropriate remedy. The Civil Application stands
disposed of.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application filed to track compliance of PIL directions is maintainable in the present form.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shaikh Sameer Rashid and anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors.Referred¶10
PIL/12/2015
Shaikh Sameer Rashid
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court