The High Court at Aurangabad allowed two civil applications seeking condonation of delay (776 and 800 days) for filing first appeals in land acquisition matters by the acquiring body.
The delay of 776 and 800 days was condoned; appeals were registered for consideration on 13.12.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1018 & 1019 (delay).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10268 OF 2018
IN FAST/2747/2018
G.M.I.D.C., THR THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. OSMANABAD AND ORS
VERSUS MARUTI SHAMRAO BHADRE
1019 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10272 OF 2018 IN FAST/2756/2018
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shinde Prashant S. Advocate for Respondent : Absent.
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. DATE : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
ORDER :
. Present applications have been filed by the acquiring body for getting the delay of 776 and 800 days condoned in filing first appeals in respective applications. The acquiring body intends to challenge the judgment and award passed by the learned reference Court. The respondents are served and they are appearing through advocate, however, advocate is absent. Under such circumstance, whatever reasons mentioned
in the applications have gone unchallenged on record.
1 of 2
1018 & 1019 (delay).doc
(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.)
SCM
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 776 and 800 days in filing first appeals against the judgment and award of the reference court.
G.M.I.D.C., THR THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. OSMANABAD AND ORS
MARUTI SHAMRAO BHADRE
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
