Allowed
Sachin Balasaheb Raner v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCA/10225/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 158-WP-8479-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10225 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8479 OF 2019
SACHIN BALASAHEB RANER
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.K. Chavan, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. M.N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
[ ANIL S.KILOR ] [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE
mta
Sachin Balasaheb Raner
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court