The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed an application for extension of time, granting only one extension.
Extension of time granted; no further extension granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 10133.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10133 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1687 OF 2018
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
PRAKASH PANDITRAO NAIK AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar
AGP for Respondents : Mr. M. K. Deshpande
...
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE: 23rd AUGUST, 2019
PER COURT:
.Time is extended as prayed as last chance. No
further extension would be granted.
[K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash Panditrao Naik
K. K. Sonawane
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court