Bail application under CrPC where counsel argued offences under SC/ST Act prevented issuance of bail. Court accepted prayer to withdraw application and granted liberty to prefer appropriate proceedings.
Prayer to withdraw bail application accepted; liberty granted to prefer appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-BA-985-19
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 985 OF 2019
Bharat @ Pintu Tukaram Sonawane
.... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra
.... Respondent
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2019
P.C. :
Ld. Counsel states that the present application is not the proper remedy for the relief claimed as the offences under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Atrocities) Act, 1989 are involved. He seeks liberty to withdraw this application. He sought liberty to file appropriate proceedings. The prayer is accepted. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to prefer appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. The application is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Mamta Kale
Bharat @ Pintu Tukaram Sonawane
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
