Suhas Haribhau Konde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

The learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement that the trial has begun and two witnesses are already examined. He submits that the progress of the trial is slow and the last witness was examined on 8^th May 2019. He submits that, at this stage considering the pendency of the trial, he seeks liberty to withdraw this application with further liberty to approach this court again if the trial is not over within a reasonable time. He also requests that order be passed for expediting the trial.

¶12

The submissions made by the learned counsel for the

¶13

Nikita Gadgil

¶14

1/2

¶15

34-BA 762-19.odt

¶16

applicant are reasonable. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail if the trial is not over within a period of four months from today.

¶17

It is further expected that the learned trial judge makes an endeavour to complete the trial much before that period because two main witnesses are already examined.

¶18

With these observations and with that liberty, the application is disposed of.

¶19

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

¶20

Nikita Gadgil

¶21

2/2

Suhas Haribhau Konde v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suhas Haribhau Konde v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alka Dattatray Shikalgar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Badal Ram Marwadikumbhar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dnyaneshwar Jivraj Kondhare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sachin Bhaskar Jore Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sanjay Shivnarayan Bhutada Vs the State of Maharashtra

Fauziya Firoz Shaikh and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra