High Court admitted bail to the applicant involved in theft and assault charges. The court granted bail pending trial on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.
The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties in the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 46-BA 385-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.385 OF 2019
Sagar @ Bhagwan Ambar Sonawane. ] … Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra. ] … Respondent
Mr. Mahendra N. Sandhyanshiv for Applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav , APP for State.
Mr. G. D. Garde, ASI attached to Jaykheda Police Station, present.
CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE :- 04 JUNE, 2019
P. C. :-
211 of 2018 registered with Jaykheda Police Station, District Nashik, under Sections 379 and 353 of the IPC. The Applicant is arrested on 26/11/2018 in connection with this offence.
URS 1 of 3
2 46-BA 385-19.odt
information, reached a river at Jaykheda. There they saw a tractor with trolley travelling nearby. The first informant and others tried to stop the said tractor. However, the driver did not stop the tractor. The first informant and others chased the tractor. The driver parked the tractor in Jaykheda village and ran away. On inspection of the tractor, they found out that it was loaded with illegally excavated sand. The tractor and the sand were seized. On further investigation, it was found that the present Applicant was the owner and the driver of the said tractor. The FIR was lodged under Sections 379 and 353 of the IPC, under Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act and under Sections 48(7) and 48(8)(1) of The Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
URS 2 of 3
3 46-BA 385-19.odt
maximum punishment for the offence is 3 years, I am inclined to grant bail to the present Applicant by allowing this application. Hence, the following order.
ORDER
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
URS 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant facing charges under Sections 379 and 353 of the IPC with a maximum punishment of 3 years.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sagar @ Bhagwan Ambar Sonawane
State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
