Allowed

Nisar Anwar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC3 Jul 2019BA/30/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal bail application, the High Court of Bombay granted bail to the applicant, Nisar Anwar Shaikh, charged with offences under Sections 302, 323, 324, 504, and 506 IPC. The court noted the absence of a killing motive and lack of antecedents, imposing standard conditions including security bond and reporting requirements while reiterating that the trial court shall decide the merits of

What did the court decide?

The applicant is enlarged on bail on executing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties, reporting monthly, and complying with various undertaking clauses.

Nisar Anwar Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

BA 30-19.doc

¶2

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2019

¶4

Nisar Anwar Shaikh .Applicant

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent

¶7

Mr. Sandeep Mishra a/w Mr. Prakash Mishra, Advocate, for the Applicant

¶8

Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Shinde, API, Mumbra Police Station, Thane present

¶9

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 03.07.2019

¶10

P.C.

¶11

. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

2. By this Application, the Applicant seeks his

¶13

enlargement on bail in connection with C. R. No. I-342 of 2018 registered with the Mumbra Police Station, District – Thane, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 324, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Perused the papers. According to the prosecution, the

¶15

1 of 5

¶16

BA 30-19.doc

¶17

incident took place on 01.07.2018 at around 12.30 to 1.00 p. m., on the 4^th floor of Muktabai building, Charnipada, Kausa, Mumbra. It is alleged by the prosecution, that the Applicant alongwith Wasim and Zaid went to the Complainant's house and were alleging that the Complainant's brother – Abdul Khalid had sexually assaulted co-accused Wasim's niece, aged 8 years. It is alleged that Wasim, Zaid and the Applicant started abusing and assaulting Abdul Khalid with bamboo sticks. According to the prosecution, when the Complainant's father intervened in the quarrel and tried to rescue Abdul, co-accused – Wasim, the Applicant and Zaid pushed the Complainant's father, as a result of which he fell on the net and thereafter, on the ground. Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that taking the prosecution as it stands, no offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is disclosed qua the Applicant. He submits that there was no intention to kill the deceased – Yunus Ali Sayyed much less to assault him. He submitted that because the safety net collapsed, the deceased fell down between 3^rd and 4^th floor and thereafter, on the ground. A perusal of the statements of the eye witnesses show, that when Abdul Khalid was being assaulted, his

¶18

2 of 5

¶19

BA 30-19.doc

¶20

father intervened, pursuant to which the accused pushed the father, as a result of which he fell on the net and thereafter on the cement slab and then on the ground. Whether or not the offence would be one punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code or lesser offence, is a matter which will be decided by the trial Court. The Applicant is in custody since August, 2018. Prima facie, the Applicant had no motive to assault the deceased much less cause his death. The Applicant has no antecedents.

¶21

4. Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed

¶22

and the Applicant is enlarged on bail on the following terms & conditions :-

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

(i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing P. R.

¶25

Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount;

¶26

(ii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer of the concerned police station on the first Monday of every

¶27

month between 10.00 a. m. and 11.00 a. m. till the conclusion of the trial;

¶28

3 of 5

¶29

BA 30-19.doc

¶30

(iii) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or

¶31

attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

¶32

(iv) The Applicant shall inform his latest place of residence

¶33

and mobile contact number immediately after being released and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time to the Court seized of the matter and to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station;

¶34

(v) The Applicant to file an undertaking with regard to Clauses (ii) to (iv) in the trial Court within two weeks of his release;

¶35

(vi) The Applicant to cooperate with the conduct of the

¶36

trial.

¶37

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and

¶38

is accordingly disposed of.

¶39

It is made clear that the observations made herein are

¶40

prima facie, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations

4 of 5

BA 30-19.doc

made in this order.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this

¶45

order.

¶46

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

¶47

5 of 5

Nisar Anwar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nisar Anwar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajaykumar Harilal Chaurasiya Vs the State of Maharashtra

Aditi Manu Mishra Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ishani Bhavik Mody Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohd. Sadik @ Sonu Mohd. Nasir Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohd. Riyaz Kayamali Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sanjay Kumar Ramchandra Behra Vs the State of Maharashtra