Allowed

Shivaji Dagadu Akhade v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Dec 2019BA/2458/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to an applicant charged with murder and culpable homicide. The court found lack of corroborative evidence for the applicant's involvement apart from an extra judicial confession and granted bail on furnishing a bond with sureties and monthly reporting to police.

What did the court decide?

Bail application allowed; applicant directed to be released on furnishing ₹25,000 bond with sureties and reporting monthly.

Shivaji Dagadu Akhade Vs the State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 of 3 950-BA-2458-2019.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2458 OF 2019

¶4

Shivaji Dagadu Akhade ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶5

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Nitesh J. Mohite a/w. Sagar Tambe for the applicant. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the State/respondent.

¶6

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 19^th December, 2019

¶7

PC :

¶8

This is an application seeking bail in connection with C.R. No. 338/2017, registered with Paud Police Station, Pune for the ofence punishable under Section 302 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short).

¶9

The First Information Report was lodged by Bhau Pandurang Margale, residence of Karve Nagar, Pune. His sister Nakabai is married to Dhondiba Sama Bawdhane. The accused Santosh is her son, while accused/present applicant Shivaji Akhade is son of informant’s another sister Fulabai Akhade. Accused Santosh along with his sister Sanika was residing in rented fat at Daulat Nagar. Dhondiba Bawdhane used to harass Nakabai by consuming

¶10

Ganesh Lokhande

¶11

2 of 3 950-BA-2458-2019.doc

¶12

liquor. On 08.10.2017 at about 11.00 a.m. son-in-law of Nakabai, Ankush Margale came to informants ofce and told him that he has received phone call of Santosh informing that on the previous night, he alongwith Shivaji assaulted his father Dhondiba. When Ankush met Bhau Margale that Ankush received phone call of Santosh. He handed over his mobile phone to the informant. The informant inquired with Santosh. He told him that in the night of 7.10.2017, when his mother and aunt returned to the fat, Dhondiba did not open the door, therefore, accused dropped them at Chandani Chowk. They returned to the fat of Fulabai. Both the accused returned to Daulat Nagar. They knocked the door forcefully, which was opened by Dhondiba, and he assaulted the accused Santosh hence he was angry. Both the accused assaulted the Dhondiba by Sickle and T.V. stand on his head. Thereafter they locked the fat and returned to Pune. The F.I.R. was registered. Investigation proceeded. Accused were arrested. It is alleged that the weapon was recovered at the instance of Santosh. Spot panchanama was recorded.

¶13

The factual aspect of the matter would indicate that the deceased used to consume liquor. The extra judicial

¶14

Ganesh Lokhande

¶15

3 of 3 950-BA-2458-2019.doc

¶16

confession indicate that the deceased had assaulted the coaccused. In retaliation, he was assaulted by accused by using T.V. stand and the sickle lying in the house. As far as applicant is concerned except extra judicial confession, there is no corroborative evidence to show involvement of the applicant in the crime. He is in custody from the date of arrest. Investigation is completed and charge-sheet is fled. In this circumstances, bail can be granted on certain terms and conditions.

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(i) Bail Application No. 2458 of 2019, is allowed; (ii) The applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.338 of 2017, registered with Paud Police Station, Pune, on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-, with one or more sureties in the like amount;

¶19

(iii) The applicants is directed to report the concerned Police Station, once in a month on frst Saturday of every month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon till further order;

¶20

(iv) Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶21

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

¶22

Ganesh Lokhande

Shivaji Dagadu Akhade v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivaji Dagadu Akhade v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjit Kumar Singh S/O. Garib Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amol Madhukar Gadekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ba @ Firoz Dilawar Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Abhishek Mahesh Motewar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sudhir Vasudeo Borkar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Omkar Dadasaheb Pujari Vs the State of Maharashtra