Allowed

Parvez Akbar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC11 Jun 2019BA/1/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application. The applicant, facing charges of cheating and forgery, had deposited Rs. 42,000. The court held further detention unwarranted and granted bail on Rs. 20,000 with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000 with conditions to furnish PR bond with sureties, report to police monthly, refrain from contacting the complainant, and cooperate in the trial.

Parvez Akbar Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

BA 1-19.doc

¶2

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2019

¶4

Parvez Akbar Shaikh .Applicant

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent

¶7

Mr. N. J. Mohite, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. A. A. Palkar, APP, for the Respondent – State

¶8

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 11.06.2019

¶9

P.C.

¶10

. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

By this Application, the Applicant seeks his

¶12

enlargement on bail in connection with C.R.No. I-320 of 2018 registered with the Narpoli Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

3. According to the Complainant – Ramesh Marathe, the

¶14

incident took place on 17.07.2018. The Complainant has alleged

¶15

1 of 4

¶16

BA 1-19.doc

¶17

that the Applicant alongwith another co-accused withdrew an amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- from his account, by using his ATM card, on the pretext of helping him withdraw the said amount. Pursuant to the complaint, the accused including the Applicant were arrested on 24.07.2018. During investigation, an amount of Rs. 68,000/- was seized from the Applicant out of Rs. 1,10,000/allegedly misappropriated by the Applicant by using the Complainant's ATM card. On the last date, the Applicant expressed his ready and willingness to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 42,000/- in the Registry of this Court without prejudice to

¶18

his rights and contentions. Accordingly, the Applicant has deposited the said amount of Rs. 42,000/- in the Registry of this Court. Learned counsel for the Applicant states that he will not file any Application seeking withdrawal of the said amount till the conclusion of the trial. Statement accepted. The Applicant has no antecedents.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid and the fact that the

¶20

Applicant is in custody since 24.07.2018, his, further detention is not warranted. Accordingly, the Application is allowed and the

¶21

2 of 4

¶22

BA 1-19.doc

¶23

Applicant is enlarged on bail on the following terms & conditions :-

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

(i) The Applicant – Parvez Shaikh be enlarged on cash

¶26

bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000/-, for a period of eight weeks ;

¶27

(ii) The Applicant shall within the said period of eight

¶28

weeks, furnish P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one or

¶29

more sureties in the like amount;

¶30

(iii) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer

¶31

of the concerned police station on the first Monday of every month for a period of six months from the date of his release;

¶32

(iv) The Applicant shall not contact the Complainant or any person concerned with the case;

¶33

(v) The Applicant shall co-operate in the conduct of the

¶34

trial.

¶35

The Application is allowed and disposed of in above

terms.

3 of 4

BA 1-19.doc

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of

¶40

this order.

¶41

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

¶42

4 of 4

Parvez Akbar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvez Akbar Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash Thakur and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohit Surendrapal Ahalwat Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Chintan Zaveri Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shyam Panalal Jaiswal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Salman Fakhruddin Shaikh@Mangya Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Ramswayanwar Tiwari @ Raj Kamal Nishad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.