In a bail application under CBJ, the single judge held that since the trial has commenced and both prosecution witnesses did not support the case, the trial would conclude within three months. Consequently, bail was not granted and the application was disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpa 1/1 3-ba-1948-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1048 OF 2019
Aklak Kondaji Shaikh .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Ravindra S. Pachundkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.A.A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATED : DECEMBER 17, 2019.
P.C. :
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that trial has commenced. The complainant and victim have been examined before the trial Court. It is submitted that both the witnesses have not supported the prosecution case. It is apparent that the trial would be over within a short span of time. In the circumstances, it is expected that the trial Court would complete the trial expeditiously and conclude the same within period of three months. Hence, application for bail is not considered at this stage. Application stands disposed of.
( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Aklak Kondaji Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
