Bail application dismissed as non-survivable. The court ordered the trial court to report on the bail granted despite this pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 14-BA No.1430-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1430 OF 2019
Sandeep Mahadev Sawant ] … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ] … Respondent
Mr. Virendra V. Pethe, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE :- 20th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :-
Purti Parab
1 of 2
2 14-BA No.1430-19.doc
application. If the applicant had not apprised the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, Kolhapur about pendency of this application, the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, Kolhapur shall take appropriate steps in accordance with law. In this view of the matter, this application does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
2 of 2
Purti Parab
Sandeep Mahadev Sawant
The State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
