Chaya Prakash Mane v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court rejected bail applications challenging alleged cheating and forgery under various IPC sections. The judge found the case unfit for bail enlargement due to ample material showing complicity and forged documents, reversing the applicants' claim of innocent professional relations.
What did the court decide?
Applications for bail were rejected. The trial court shall decide the case on its own merits.
What the court decided
BA 1181-19 (common order).doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1181 OF 2019
Yogita Abhijit Savratkar .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents
WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 103 OF 2019
Chaya Prakash Mane .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & anr. .Respondents
Mr. Anand S. Patil, Advocate, for the Applicants in both matters Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Niranjan Mundargi a/w Mr. V. V. Mohite i/b. Mr. Siddharth Karpe, Advocate, for the Intervenor / Respondent No. 2
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused are entitled to bail given the allegations of cheating and forgery and the opposition by the State.
If the material on record negates the claim that the complainant was an active director unaware of company activities, affecting bail likelihood.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Yogita Abhijit Savratkar
- applicant
Chaya Prakash Mane
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- intervenor
Pritam Gaikwad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court