Disposed

Prakashrao Shamrao Patil, Thr. Its Prop. Prakashrao Shamrao Patil v. Office of General Manager, Telecom District

Bombay HC3 Apr 2019ARP/132/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this arbitration petition, the court, by consent, appointed Mr. J.C. Shirsale as the sole arbitrator to decide disputes arising from an agreement between the petitioner and the respondent. The order sets procedural directions regarding disclosure, venue, timelines, and costs.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. J.C. Shirsale as sole arbitrator; venue at Nashik; final award within one year; initial costs borne equally.

Prakashrao Shamrao Patil, Thr. Its Prop. Prakashrao… — Specific Performance | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

ssp 938 arp 132 of 2018.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.132 OF 2018

¶4

Prakashrao Shamrao Patil

¶5

…Petitioner

¶6

versus

¶7

Office of the General Manager, Telecom
District, Nashik Sanchar Bhavan …Respondent

¶8

Mr. Nikhil Wadikar I/by Mr. Nandu V. Pawar, for Petitioner.
Mrs. Neeta V. Masurkar with Ms. Nieyaati Masurkar, for Respondent.

¶9

CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

¶10

DATE: 3rd APRIL, 2019

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

1.Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties and the following
order is passed by consent :

¶13

(i)Mr. J.C.Shirsale, Retired District Judge, is appointed as the sole

¶14

Arbitrator to decide the disputes between the parties arising out of the Agreement
dated 29th June, 2016.

¶15

(ii)Mr. J.C.Shirsale, Retired District Judge, shall forward his disclosure
under Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

¶16

1996 as amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of
2016) to the Registrar, Judicial I of this Court within a period of one week from today
and also forward copies of the same to the Advocates for the parties.

¶17

(iii)The parties and/or their Advocates shall appear before the learned

¶18

1/2

¶19

ssp 938 arp 132 of 2018.doc

¶20

Arbitrator in his chambers, on 8th April, 2019 at 11.00 a.m. and obtain necessary

¶21

directions.

¶22

(iv)The learned Arbitrator shall endeavour to pass his final Award within a
period of one year from the date of this order.

¶23

(v) The learned Arbitrator shall not grant adjournments to the parties
unless absolutely necessary.

¶24

(vi) All contentions of the parties are kept open.

¶25

(vii) The cost of arbitration shall initially be borne by the parties equally.

¶26

(viii) The venue of Arbitration shall be at Nashik.

¶27

(ix)The above Arbitration Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶28

( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )

¶29

2/2

Prakashrao Shamrao Patil, Thr. Its Prop. Prakashrao Shamrao Patil v. Office of General Manager, Telecom District

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakashrao Shamrao Patil, Thr. Its Prop. Prakashrao Shamrao Patil v. Office of General Manager, Telecom District

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Suvarna Anil Ghodke and Anr. Vs Mr. Jagannath Balaji Ghodke and Ors.

Magic Motors a Partnership Firm Thr. Its Nishatn Prakashchandra Bhutada and Ors. Vs Tata Capital Financial Services Limited

Kanchan Motors Thr. Its Prop. Nishant Bhutada (Huf) and Anr. Vs Tata Capital Financial Services Limited

Shree Mahavira Jaina Vidyalaya and 5 Ors. Vs Shri Mahavir Developers and 12 Ors.

The State of Maharashtra Vs R.J.Shah and Co.Ltd

Somap International Pte. Ltd. Vs M. v. Esi Anax (Imo No. 9214587) and Orange Walk Corporation