This court restored an anticipatory bail application that had been dismissed for want of prosecution, finding that the application was filed within the limitation period and sufficient cause existed for restoration.
The application for restoration of the antecedent anticipatory bail application is allowed in terms of the prayer clause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osk 27-appp-98-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2019 IN
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1594 OF 2018
Rajesh Sitaram Halwai & Anr. … Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr.Chandrakant Vithal for Applicant. Mr.Ajay Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 26th March 2019.
P.C. :
1] This is an application for restoration of ABA No. 1594 of 2018, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 8th January 2019.
2] The present application is filed within the period of limitation. Sufficient cause is made out for restoration of the application. 3] In view thereof, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
[A.S. GADKARI, J.]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for restoration of a dismissed anticipatory bail application within the period of limitation.
Rajesh Sitaram Halwai & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
