The High Court allowed an application by the original complainant to intervene in an anticipatory bail application, permitting him to assist the prosecution.
The applicant (original complainant) is allowed to assist the prosecution in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.APPP.388.19 in.ABA.2255.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 388 OF 2019 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2255 OF 2018
| Nandkishore Lakshman Dalvi | ... | Orig. Complainant/Intervener |
|---|---|---|
| In the matter between | ||
| Deepak Baban Patil Versus |
... | Applicant |
| The State of Maharashtra | ... | Respondent |
Mr. Abhiman Patil i/b Mr. Mahendra Shingade for the Applicant. Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State. Mr. Shikhare, A.P.I., E.O.W.-II, Navi Mumbai, present.
CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 10th APRIL, 2019.
P.C. :
1 This application is for intervention filed by original complainant.
2 For the grounds mentioned therein, application is allowed. Applicant is allowed to assist the prosecution.
(P.N. DESHMUKH, J.)
Waghmare
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow an original complainant to intervene in a criminal application proceeding.
Deepak Baban Patil
The State of Maharashtra
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
