Disposed
Shaikh Mohd. Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed (Guddu) v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPP/320/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appp.320.19.905.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 320 OF 2019 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN
ANTICIPTORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 448 OF 2019
Shaikh Mohd. Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed (Guddu) ...Applicant/Intervener
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Mehmood Alam Nizamuddin Siddiqui Bakkan Sardar @ Mehmood Sardar @ Baccha Seth ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Rohan Surve for the Applicant/Intervener
Mr. S. R. Gaud I/b Mr. Shaikh Abdul Kalam for the Applicant
Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. THURSDAY, 13th JUNE 2019
P.C.
1 For the reasons set out in the application, application is allowed. The applicant to implead the intervener as party respondent No. 2 in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 448 of 2019. Amendment to be
1/2
SQ Pathan
appp.320.19.905.doc
carried out forthwith. Mr. Rohan Surve waives notice on behalf of the
intervener/added respondent No.2.
2 Application is accordingly disposed of.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
SQ Pathan
Shaikh Mohd. Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed
Mehmood Alam
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court