Single judge order allowing an intervention application by the first informant in a pending criminal matter and directing impleadment as a respondent.
Intervention application allowed; first informant to be impleaded as respondent No.1; amendment done within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appp.1509-2018.doc
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1509 OF 2018 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2239 OF 2018
Vipul Kakubhai Kamdar ..Applicant
In the matter between:
Vineet Manilal Nisar & Anr. ..Applicants Vs
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
Ms. Sushma Mishra for the Applicant/Intervener. Mr. A.A. Sontakke I/b R.S. Salunkhe for the Applicant. Mr. R.M. Pethe, APP for State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 11th March 2019.
P.C.:
1] This is an application for intervention by the first informant Mr.
Vipul K. Kamdar in CR No.103 of 2018 dated 1st March 2018 registered with Bhayandar Police Station, Thane (Rural).
2] For the reasons stated in the application, Intervention Application is allowed.
3] The applicants in A.B.A. No.2239 of 2018 are directed to implead the first informant as respondent No.1. Amendment be carried out
1/2
appp.1509-2018.doc
within a period of two weeks from today and an amended copy of the application be served upon the learned counsel for the first informant within the same stipulated period.
4] Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
2/2
Vipul Kakubhai Kamdar
Vineet Manilal Nisar
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
