The single judge of the Bombay High Court dismissed three criminal applications (two criminal applications and one criminal revision application) for want of prosecution because none of the applicants appeared before the court on the summoned dates.
The applications are dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
203-APPLN-389 OF 2003.odt
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.389 OF 2003
Dilip H. Deshmukh and others. ] Applicants Versus Ashwini A. Kamat and another. ] Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2007
Ashwini A. Kamat ] Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.396 OF 2007
Shashikant Laxman Prabhu ] Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and another. ] Respondents
None appears for the Applicants.
Ms. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 13TH NOVEMBER, 2019.
1 of 2
203-APPLN-389 OF 2003.odt
P.C. :
None appeared for the Applicants on 4th June, 2019 and 18th September, 2019. Even today, none appears for the Applicants. The Applications are dismissed for want of prosecution.
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.]
2 of 2
Dilip H. Deshmukh and others
Ashwini A. Kamat
State of Maharashtra and another
Shashikant Laxman Prabhu
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
