hyoid bone, there were other injuries like abrasions over right elbow and left elbow. In the P.M. report, the cause of death is given as death due to cardiorespiratory arrest due to strangulation. Though such P.M. report is there, subsequently again opinion was obtained from Rural Hospital Newasa and in that opinion dated 5.7.2016 the opinion was given that the strangulation can be due to suicide or also due to homicide. Below such opinion it is mentioned that there were injuries at both elbows and there were ligature mark of ‘O’ shape. It appears that on that night Babu had entered the house of present informant and then some incident had taken place and after that the dead body of Babu was found. The F.I.R. was given only after P.M. report and not immediately on the same night and the crime came to be registered due to aforesaid circumstances. Giving of such report against the deceased cannot be treated as abetment of suicide of the deceased. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the crime for the ofence of murder came to be registered against the deceased and others. Such circumstance cannot bring even the informant under section 306 of I.P.C. as intention as required under section 107 of I.P.C. is required to be shown. It can be said that it was not within the knowledge of deceased as to who had given report or who had given statement before police. In the F.I.R., it is not mentioned that Shashwat was arrested in the said crime. Chargesheet is not yet fled in that crime and so, it cannot be said that all the applicants had given statements against Pappu alias
