Nikhil S/O. Shankar Helaskar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC14 Aug 2019APPLN/2196/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed criminal application seeking quashing of FIR and subsequent regular criminal case under Sections 498-A and others. The Court held that as parties had settled the dispute and intended to file for mutual divorce, the relief of quashing was granted.

What did the court decide?

The First Information Report No.389 of 2018 and Regular Criminal Case No. 268 of 2018 are hereby quash and set-aside.

Nikhil S/O. Shankar Helaskar and Others Vs the State… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

961- Cri. Appln. No. 2196-2019.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2196 OF 2019

¶6

1.	Nikhil S/o Shankar Helaskar, Age : 33 Years, Occ. Business,
2.	Shankar S/o Digambar Helaskar, Age : 64 Years, Occ. Business,
3.	Manda W/o Shankar Helaskar, Age : 54 Years, Occ. Household,
	1 to 3 resident of Mahesh Nagar, Sailu, Tq. Sailu Dist. Parbhani
4.	Sow. Shweta W/o Swapnil Helaskar, Age : 31 Years, Occ. Household, R/o. Mahesh Nagar, Sailu, Tq. Sailu, Dist. Parbhani Now at Flat No. 702, Building A-3, Warje Malwadi, Warje, Pune City.
5.	Sumit S/o Harishchandra Akkar, Age : 33 Years, Occ. Business, R/o. Kasar Galli, Ozar, Tq. Niphad, Dist. Nashik
6.	Ankita W/o Sumit Akkar, Age : 31 Years, Occ. Household, R/o. Kasar Galli, Ozar, Tq. Niphad, Dist. Nashik	..PETITIONERS
	VERSUS
1.	The State of Maharashtra, Through the Police Station Officer, Kaij Police Station, Dist. Beed.
2.	Sou. Rutuja W/o Nikhil Helaskar, Age : 25 Years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Shukrawar Peth, Gandhi Chowk, Kaij, Dist. Beed.	..RESPONDENTS

¶7

¶8

961- Cri. Appln. No. 2196-2019.odt

¶9

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S. D. Ingle APP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde Advocate for Respondents No.2: Mr. N.R. Thorat

¶10

CORAM :T.V. NALAWADE AND K.K. SONAWANE ,JJ. DATE : 14^th AUGUST, 2019.

¶11

JUDGMENT : [PER T.V. NALAWADE, J.]

¶12

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal.

¶13

The proceeding is filed for relief of quashing of First Information Report No.389 of 2018 registered with Kaij Police Station, District Beed for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and case filed in the said FIR Bearing Regular Criminal Case No. 268 of 2018, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Fist Class, Kaij, District Beed. Relief of quashing of that case is also claimed. Amendment to be carried out to add that relief in main matter.

¶14

During the argument, learned counsel for the applicants and first informant submits that parties have settled the dispute. They have filed affidavit of both the sides. It appears that parties have decided to file the proceeding bearing Hindu Marriage Petition No. 93 of 2018, in the

¶15

3 961- Cri. Appln. No. 2196-2019.odt

¶16

Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, at Parbhani for mutual divorce and they have settled the dispute. The wife has not intention to give evidence against the husband and relatives. In view of this circumstances, this Court holds that relief needs to be given. In the result, following order :-

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Application is allowed.

¶19

The First Information Report No.389 of 2018 registered with Kaij Police Station, District Beed and the case filed in the FIR bearing R.C.C. No. 268 of 2018, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Fist Class, Kaij, District Beed both are hereby quash and set-aside.

¶20

Rule made absolute in those terms.

¶21

[ K.K. SONAWANE ] [ T.V. NALAWADE ] JUDGE JUDGE

¶22

YSK/

Nikhil S/O. Shankar Helaskar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nikhil S/O. Shankar Helaskar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashant S/O. Ramdas Dongre and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Laxmi Contractors through Its Proprietor D B Lavhale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ankush S/O. Rangnath Nannaware Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kishan Rama Wane Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shriram Laxman Bangar and Other Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vinod S/O Vishnu Nade and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra