Dismissed
Union of India v. Abdul Rahim Shaikh and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/103/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
appln 103.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28 appln 103.2018.doc
1/1
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.103 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO.125 OF 2019
Union of India .... Applicant Vs. Abdul Rahim Shaikh & Ors. .... Respondents
None for the applicant.
Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for State.
Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J. Date : 24th April 2019
P.C.:
1 Earlier on 21st December 2018, this Court had dismissed
the application for want of prosecution, since spare copies were not supplied despite the fact that the notice was issued. On the same day, subsequently Mr. Mane mentioned the matter and the application was restored. The office note shows that the spare copies
of the memorandum are not filed till today. Hence, the application
stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
( Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav , J)
Union of India
Abdul Rahim Shaikh
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court