A criminal application seeking bail was rejected as there was no ground for entertaining it because the applicant had already withdrawn a similar earlier application. The court expedited the hearing of the underlying criminal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-APPA 969 of 2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 969 OF 2019
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1101 OF 2018
Aditya Sham Chaturvedi ...APPLICANT/ ORG.APPELLANT
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ...RESPONDENT
None for the Applicant / Appellant
Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J.
DATE : AUGUST 28,2019
P.C. :
9-APPA 969 of 2019.doc
No. 1526/2018. It was heard at length and when this Court was going to reject it, the Learned Counsel for the Applicant had sought permission to withdraw the said application and, hence, the said first bail application came to be rejected as withdrawn by this Court.
Tikam
Aditya Sham Chaturvedi
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
