A second bail application was disposed of by the Court without a detailed hearing note, after noting that the applicant had already served approximately eight years in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nalawade
25-appa-710-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 710 OF 2019
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2017
Sameerulla @ Samiulla Subhanaulla Chaudhari ….Applicant.
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent.
Ms. Prabha U. Badadare Applicant. Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for State.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 06th June, 2019
PC :
states that applicant accused has already put in about 8 years behind bars hence matter may be heard at the earliest.
Criminal Application No. 273 of 2017 that this court has found no substance in application for bail.
Page-1/2
Nalawade
25-appa-710-19.doc
(MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.)
( B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page-2/2
Sameerulla @ Samiulla Subhanaulla Chaudhari
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
