Criminal Application filed by Sitaram Dina Mandal seeking condonation of 100-day delay in filing appeal against conviction. Single Judge allowed condonation in interest of justice and disposed of application.
Application for condonation of delay allowed; application stands disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dusane
30 appa 503.2019.doc
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.503 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) 305 OF 2019
Sitaram Dina Mandal .... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Ms. Megha S. Bajoria for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa APP for the State.
Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav , J. Date : 1st April 2019
P.C.:
1 This is an application seeking condonation of delay in
filing the appeal challenging the conviction imposed upon the applicant by Special Judge (POCSO), Thane in Special Case No. 124 of 2017. The delay is o f 100 days.
2 For the reasons assigned in paragraph nos. 2 and 3, the
application seeking condonation of delay deserves to allowed in the
Dusane
2/2 30 appa 503.2019.doc
interest of justice. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and stands disposed of.
3 Call for records and proceedings in order to enable the learned counsel appointed for the appellant to draft the appeal and go through the notes of evidence. Records be received as far as possible within three weeks from today.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing appeal under Section 308 of BNS 2023 requires condonation in interest of justice?
Sitaram Dina Mandal
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
