Dismissed

Mangal Raghunath Jadhav v. Sandeep Shrikant Dhonde and Anr.

Bombay HC3 Oct 2019APPA/1579/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court rejected four criminal applications filed by the applicant/first informant seeking cancellation of bail for convicted respondents. The applicant alleged respondent No.1 was terrorized by hoardings installed after release and complaints were ignored. The court found the release warrants indicated respondents were in jail when hoardings were posted and directed the applicant to pursue non-

What did the court decide?

Applications for cancellation of bail and suspension of sentence during pendency of appeals were rejected.

Mangal Raghunath Jadhav Vs Sandeep Shrikant Dhonde and Anr. — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

11-appa-1579-2018.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1579/2018 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1245/2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.942/2018

¶6

MANGAL RAGHUNATH JADHAV )…. APPLICANT.

¶7

V/s.

¶8

SANDEEP SHRIKANT DHONDE & ANR. ).... RESPONDENT.

¶9

WITH

¶10

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1580/2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1246/2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.943/2018

¶11

MANGAL RAGHUNATH JADHAV )...APPLICANT.

¶12

Vs.

¶13

SURESH BABAN SANAS & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS.

¶14

WITH

¶15

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1578/2018

¶16

Chitra Sonawane 1/5

¶17

11-appa-1579-2018.doc

¶18

¶19

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1247/2018 IN

¶20

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.944/2018

¶21

MANGAL RAGHUNATH JADHAV )…. APPLICANT.

¶22

VS.

¶23

KUMAR VASANT GOLE & ORS. )....RESPONDENT.

¶24

Ms Swapna Kode a/w Shruti Mundargi a/w Abhijit Dhanure, for applicant.

¶25

Mr.Harshawardhan Salgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for State.

¶26

CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 3^rd October, 2019.

¶27

P.C.:

¶28

1. By these applications, the applicant/first informant is

¶29

seeking for cancellation of bail granted to respondent no.1 by suspending their sentence during pendency of appeals filed by them. Respondent no.1 in these applications are convicted by

¶30

Chitra Sonawane 2/5

¶31

11-appa-1579-2018.doc

¶32

the learned trial court for offences punishable under Section

¶33

306 and 323 of Indian Penal Code as well as u/s 3(1)(x) of the The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989.

¶34

Heard learned counsel appearing for applicant/first informant. She argued that after release of respondent no.1 in pursuant to order dated 21.8.2018 by this Court, hoardings are affixed in the locality mentioning that tiger is returning with same fury. This according to learned counsel for the applicant is terrorizing the applicant and her complaints lodged to several authorities are not entertained by those authorities. Learned counsel for respondent no.1/appellant submits that appellants were released in pursuant to release warrant dated 27.8.2018 whereas, according to applicant/first informant the hoardings were installed in the locality on 23.08.2018. Learned counsel has pointed out that the release warrants were issued by the learned Additional Sessions

¶35

Chitra Sonawane 3/5

¶36

11-appa-1579-2018.doc

¶37

Judge, Thane on 27.8.2018.

¶38

Release warrants dated 27.8.2019 makes it clear that respondent no.1 in all these cases were in jail when the hoardings came to be installed in the locality. So far as, non entertainment of complaints by the authorities is concerned, it is for the applicant to take recourse to the law.

¶39

No case for cancellation of bail as such is made out. The applications are, therefore, unmerited. Hence, the following order.

¶40

:ORDER:

¶41

Applications are rejected.

¶42

Chitra Sonawane 4/5

¶43

11-appa-1579-2018.doc

¶44

5/5

¶45

Chitra Sonawane

Mangal Raghunath Jadhav v. Sandeep Shrikant Dhonde and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangal Raghunath Jadhav v. Sandeep Shrikant Dhonde and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhu @ Lakhan Dharma Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Aizaz Nabban Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Lakhu @ Lakhan Dharma Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Wasim Mohiddin Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vitthal Madhukar Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mangal Raghunath Jadhav Vs Kumar Vasant Gole and Ors.