The appeal was dismissed as not pressed by the appellants. They were granted liberty to raise all permissible grounds before the learned Single Judge on the pending notice of motion, which stood disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
914-APPL.404.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO. 404 OF 2019 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 829 OF 2019
LJ Tanna Enterprises Private Limited } and Ors. } Appellants versus The National Spot Exchange Limited } and Ors. } Respondents
Mr.Rohan Cama with Mr.Bhushan Shah, Ms.Neha Lakshman and Mr.Veer Ashar i/b. M/s.Mansukhlal Hiralal and Co. for the appellants.
Mr.Aspi Chinoy-Senior Advocate with Mr.Arvind Lakhawat, Mr.Vishwanathan Iyer, Mr.Melvyn Fernandes and Ms.Pratiksha Agrawal i/b. M/s.Vaish Associates for respondent no.1.
Mr.Vikram Nankani-Senior Advocate with Ms.Gulhar Mistry and Ms.Namita Shetty i/b. M/s.Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas for respondent no.2.
Ms.Jyoti Chavan-AGP for respondent no.3.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED :- SEPTEMBER 11, 2019
P.C. :-
order is yet to be passed in the pending notice of motion. The
Page 1 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
914-APPL.404.2019.doc
appellants, therefore, say that they will not press this appeal, but raise all permissible grounds, including absence of an appropriate methodology, before the learned Single Judge.
Page 2 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
LJ Tanna Enterprises Private Limited
The National Spot Exchange Limited
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
