Disposed

Durga Rupraj Naidu v. Ankur Vishal Naidu and Ors.

Bombay HC8 Nov 2019APL/579/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant withdrew criminal application with liberty to file a separate application under Section 25 of the Domestic Violence Act relying on a will, which was not previously produced before trial or appellate courts. Court directed subordinate court to decide the DV application expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file application under Section 25 of the Domestic Violence Act.

Durga Rupraj Naidu Vs Ankur Vishal Naidu and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2019)

32-apl.579.2018.doc

1/3

nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.579 OF 2018

¶5

Durga Rupraj Naidu ...Applicant Versus Ankur Vishal Naidu and Ors. ...Respondents

¶6

Mr. A.D.Sarwate, for the Applicant.

¶7

Mr.Kishor Walanju, Appointed Advocate, for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶8

Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.5- State.

¶9

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

¶10

DATE : 8^th NOVEMBER, 2019

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 raises a preliminary objection. He submits that the documents i.e. Will on which the applicant relies, was not produced either before the trial Court or before the Appellate Authority and as such it is not open for them to produce the same for the first time in this Court. He submits that the said Will was produced only after the impugned order dated 3^rd May, 2017, was passed by the Appellate Authority, in Review Application which was dismissed on the ground of maintainability.

¶13

32-apl.579.2018.doc

¶14

2/3

¶15

Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that it is always open for the applicant to file an appropriate application under Section 25 of the Domestic Violence Act, before the trial Court, which can be decided by the trial Court, on its own merits, in accordance with law.

¶16

In view of the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw this application, with liberty to file an appropriate application under Section 25 of the Domestic Violence Act, in view of the document on which he proposes to rely i.e. Will of the applicant’s late husband.

¶17

Application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

¶18

If an application is filed by the applicant under Section 25 of the Domestic Violence Act, the learned trial Judge to decide the same expeditiously, on its own merits, in accordance with law. All contentions of both the parties are kept open.

¶19

32-apl.579.2018.doc

¶20

3/3

¶21

High Court Legal Services Committee to award fees of the learned Appointed Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, as per Rules.

¶22

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶23

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Durga Rupraj Naidu v. Ankur Vishal Naidu and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durga Rupraj Naidu v. Ankur Vishal Naidu and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Bhaskar Zope Vs Sadguru Sakharam Maharaj Vitthal Rukmini Sanstha and Ors.

Ujiyare Lal Dohare Vs M/S. Astra Container Line Private Limited and Anr.

Baskaran Kesavareddiyar Vs M/S. Astra Container Line Private Limited and Anr.

Sanjay S/O. Omprakash Sharma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mahesh Nenshi Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shantibhai N Gohil and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.