Allowed

Mahesh Bhanudas Gole v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Aug 2019APL/340/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an application under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings pending against the applicant. The court relied on the amicable settlement between parties and held that no purpose would be served in keeping the trial pending. Costs of Rs. 10,000 were ordered to be paid by the applicant to a charitable trust.

What did the court decide?

Criminal proceedings quashed subject to payment of Rs. 10,000 costs to a charitable trust within four weeks.

Mahesh Bhanudas Gole Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

28-APL340-17.DOC

¶2

Santosh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRI APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2017

Mahesh Bhanudas Gole

...Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & ors. …Respondents

¶9

Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma I/b Mr. P. G. Sawant, for the

¶10

Applicant.

¶11

Ms. Sangita Shinde, APP for the State/Respondent no.1. Mr. Vijay Gaikwad, for Respondent no.3.

¶12

CORAM: RANJIT MORE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED: 19^th AUGUST, 2019

¶13

PC:-

¶14

1. The applicant at the outset seeks leave to amend the prayer Clause (a) of the application.

¶15

Leave granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶16

2. Heard Mr. Sharma, the learned Counsel for the applicant, Ms. Shinde, the learned APP for the State and Mr. Gaikwad, the learned Counsel for respondent no.3.

¶17

3. The application is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for quashing criminal proceeding being C.C. No.199/PW/2019 pending on the file of the Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37^th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. The said case arises out of registration of the FIR

¶18

1/4

¶19

28-APL340-17.DOC

¶20

being CR No.105 of 2016 registered with Cyber Police Station, Mumbai, for the offences punishable under Sections 354-D, 509 of Indian Penal Code and Section 66/D of the Information Technology Act.

¶21

4. Pending trial, the parties to the application settled their dispute amicably and, in pursuance of an understanding arrived at between them, filed the instant application for quashing the proceedings of the subject criminal case by consent. Respondent no.3 has filed an affidavit dated 5^th April, 2019. In paragraphs 5, she has given no objection for quashing and setting-aside the subject FIR and criminal proceeding being C.C. No.199/PW/ of 2019 pending on the file of the Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37^th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai. Respondent No.3 is personally present before the Court. On being questioned, she specifically stated that she has gone through the application and the affidavit as well and has fully understood the contents thereof. She further confirmed that she is giving no objection for quashing the proceedings of the subject criminal case on her own free will and without there being any pressure or coercion.

¶22

5. It can, thus, be seen that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. From the perusal of complaint, it

¶23

2/4

¶24

28-APL340-17.DOC

¶25

transpires that the allegations are totally personal in nature. In these circumstances, and especially, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab¹ , we find that no purpose would be served by keeping the criminal proceedings pending except burdening the Criminal Courts which are already overburdened. However, at the same time, costs need to be saddled on the parties for using the police and judicial mechanism for settling their personal disputes.

¶26

6. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause (a) subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/by the applicants to the “Yashodhan Charitable Trust” (having Registration No.1895/Satara, Maharashtra, Account No. 60245873355 IFSC Code MAHB000305), an institution that takes care of mentally retarded and elderly people in the downtrodden society. The applicant shall pay the said costs and produce the receipt thereof on the file of this Court within a period of four weeks from today, failing which, the writ petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Court and the order quashing the criminal proceedings shall be treated as non-est.

¶27

1 2014 AIR (SCW) 2065

¶28

3/4

¶29

28-APL340-17.DOC

¶30

7. Subject to above, the criminal application stands

¶31

disposed of.

¶32

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

¶33

[RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶34

4/4

Mahesh Bhanudas Gole v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Bhanudas Gole v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Vikas Thakur Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Rathod Gajendradatta Mahadeo and Ors. Vs Santosh Pandurang Lokhande and Ors.

Veerbhadram Bhauvsingh Vislvath Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Prakash Waman Korgaonkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Purshottam Vishandas Raheja and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Manik Anant Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra