In Criminal Application No. 251 of 2019, the Bombay High Court allowed the applicant to withdraw his application pursuant to a petition by counsel. The application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application was granted; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 913 APL 251-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.251 of 2019
Clinton Cajetan Cornelius Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors
.. Applicant
.. Respondents
Ms.Sunita Banis for the applicant. Ms. Anita Gavkar for respondent nos.2 to 4.
Mr.Deepak Thakare, PP with Mrs.A.S. Pai, APP for the State.
CORAM: SHRI RANJIT MORE &
SMT. BHARATI H.DANGRE, JJ.
DATED : 28th MARCH 2019
P.C:-
1 Learned counsel for the applicant, having taken
instructions seeks leave to withdraw the application.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Tilak
Clinton Cajetan Cornelius
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Bharati D Hangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
