Allowed
Ups Madan v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCAPL/1311/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-apl-1311-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1311 OF 2018
UPS Madan ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents ----
Mr.D.J. Khambata, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.Shardul Singh i/b S.S. Diwan for the Applicant.
Mr.Deepak Thakare, PP a/w Mr.K.V. Saste, APP for the RespondentState.
Mr.Aditya Pratap for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : 22nd APRIL 2019
P.C.
in terms of prayer clause (a).
(SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 1
UPS Madan
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court