Ramkishan Panditrao Kinhalkar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal applications were allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed by the High Court of Bombay on urgent mentioning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
apl.1187.2018+_503.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1187 OF 2018
Shri Ramkishan Panditrao Kinhalkar … Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1186 OF 2018
Shri Balbhim Nangath Bhosale … Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr.Rushikesh Kale i/b V.V. Purwant for the Applicant
Mr.Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATED: APRIL 11, 2019
P.C.:
applications are allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Shri Ramkishan Panditrao Kinhalkar
Shri Balbhim Nangath Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court