(Exhibit 19) proved by P.W.No.2 Subhash Sawant makes this fact clear. Hence, though the incident has happened at residential area, as it took place inside the house, there cannot be any eye witness to the same, except the injured. Hence, on this ground, version of P.W.No.1 Lata Jadhav cannot be doubted. She categorically denied the suggestion that her husband was assaulted by some unidentified person. The appellant/accused was known to her and there is no reason to doubt identification of the appellant/accused by P.W.No.1 Lata Jadhav. Soon before the incident and at about 10.00 p.m. of 10/10/2014, the appellant/accused, as stated by P.W.No.3 Sujata Dhotare, had taken to the house of injured P.W.No.1 Lata Jadhav and her husband Narayan. P.W.No.3 Sujata Dhotare is their daughter. She stated that on the pretext of placing the order for food, she was taken by the appellant/accused to the house of her parents. Thus, the appellant/accused sought knowledge of the place of residence of the injured from her daughter P.W.No.3 Sujata Dhotare and after getting this knowledge, had committed the crime in question.
