alp 31.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
Accused admitted to bail on same terms and conditions ordered by the court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Dusane
20 alp 31.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 31 OF 2016
Arif Rashid Khan....Applicant
Vs.
Arif Hamid Khan & Ors.....Respondents
Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the State.
None for Respondent no.1.
Coram : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
Date : 19th November 2019
P.C.:
1. Heard.
2. Leave granted.
3. Admit. Learned APP waives service of notice.
4. None appears for respondent no.1. Action under Section
390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be taken. Accused be admitted
to bail on same terms and conditions on which he was ordered to be
released by the Court below.
5.Call for records and proceedings.
Arif Rashid Khan
Arif Hamid Khan
NITIN W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court