The applicant moved for anticipatory bail and subsequently sought leave to withdraw the application on instructions, undertaking to surrender before the trial court. The court disposed of the application by allowing the withdrawal.
Application disposed of as dismissed as allowed to be withdrawn; liberty to appear before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.ABA.399.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 399 OF 2019
| Rohit Shankar Jadhav Versus |
... | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| The State of Maharashtra | ... | Respondent |
Mr. Viresh V. Purwant for the Applicant. Ms. S.S. Kaushik, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State. Ms. Kshitija Saranji for Original Complainant.
Mr. Ranjit Mane, A.P.I. Crime Branch, Solapur City, present.
CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 8th APRIL, 2019.
P.C. :
confirm the interim protection, learned Counsel for applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application and undertakes to surrender before the trial Court on or before 16.04.2019.
Waghmare
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit Shankar Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
