Laxman Tukaram Nimbalkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant was absent on multiple dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 907-ABA-289-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.289 OF 2019
Laxman Tukaram Nimbalkar .... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 19th JUNE, 2019
P.C. :
04/06/2019 nobody appeared for the Applicant.
for non-prosecution.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nesarikar
Laxman Tukaram Nimbalkar
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court