Dismissed

Saurabh Jyotiram Atole v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC26 Sept 2019ABA/2087/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail. The court held that the gravity of the offence, involvement of weapons in a public place, specific role attributed to the applicant, and presence of a grievous injury necessitated custodial interrogation and denied bail.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application of the applicant is rejected; custodial interrogation is necessary.

Saurabh Jyotiram Atole Vs the State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 / 3 915-ABA-2087-19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2087 OF 2019

¶4

Saurabh Jyotiram Atole .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent

¶5

Mr.Rupesh A. Zade, Advocate for Applicant.

¶6

Mr.Prashant Jadhav, APP for the State/Respondent.

¶7

PN Mr.A.J. Kawade, Baramati Police Station, Pune, present.

¶8

CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 26^th SEPTEMBER, 2019

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection

¶11

with C.R.No.697/19 registered with Baramati Police Station, Pune, under sections 326, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The FIR is lodged on 30/08/2019 by one Bapu Vandan

¶13

Bibe. He has stated that he was having a grocery shop in village Sawal. There was a dispute in respect of that shop with Pravin Dnyandeo Atole and Adesh Jyotiram Atole. On 14/08/2019 there was a quarrel between the parties for which complaints were given at Baramati police station. On 30/08/2019 while he

¶14

Nesarikar

¶15

2 / 3 915-ABA-2087-19.odt

¶16

was present in Ambedkar Chauk in his village, at that time, accused Adesh Jyotiram Atole, Vinod Vitthal Atole, present Applicant, Nagesh Tulshiram Atole and Sunny Chavan along with three other unknown persons came near him. They were carrying weapons like iron rods and wooden sticks. All of them started assaulting informant. It is mentioned in the FIR that the Applicant and others also assaulted him with sticks and fist and kick blows. The informant’s wife Rani Bibe tried to intervene to save her husband, but she was also assaulted on her head. Her gold ornament was lost in the incident. The Applicant removed the informant’s key of his two wheeler. The informant suffered injuries including fracture. Thereafter the assailants went away from the spot. On this basis, FIR is registered.

¶17

Heard learned Counsel Mr.Rupesh A. Zade for the Applicant and learned APP Mr.Prashant Jadhav for the State.

¶18

Mr.Zade submitted that the weapons were recovered from the other arrested accused Vinod Atole and Nagesh Atole. He therefore prays that the present Applicant should be granted anticipatory bail.

¶19

3 / 3 915-ABA-2087-19.odt

¶20

Learned APP opposed the application.

¶21

I have considered these submissions. I have perused the papers of investigation and in particular, the injury certificates in respect of injuries suffered by the first informant and his wife. The first informant suffered four injuries. The first injury was multiple abrasions which was in consonance to the assault by all the assailants. More importantly, there was fracture of metacarpal bone. This injury is grievous. Thus offence u/s 326 is made out. Specific role is attributed to the present Applicant. Provisions of section 149 of IPC are also applied. Therefore, considering the seriousness of the offence and also taking into consideration the fact that the assault had taken place at a public place without any fear of law, no protection of anticipatory bail can be granted to the Applicant. His custodial interrogation is necessary. In this view of the matter, the application is rejected.

¶22

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Saurabh Jyotiram Atole v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurabh Jyotiram Atole v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Ramdas Khole Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kiran Namdev Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra

Deepak @ Panda Rohidas Ghanwat Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sajid @ Tipu Dastagir Naik Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anil Sarjerao Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sunil Shivaji Kale Vs the State of Maharashtra