Allowed

Darshan Ramesh Kasar and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Jun 2019ABA/186/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by two accused students alleged with no overt role in an assault incident, granting pre-arrest bail on specified standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Granted pre-arrest bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with one or two sureties in like amount, subject to reporting changes and cooperation with trial.

Darshan Ramesh Kasar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

36.ABA186_2019.doc

¶2

Vidya Amin.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 186 OF 2019

¶5

Darshan Ramesh Kasar 2. Chetan Mohan Kasar … Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶6

Mr. Vinay J. Bhopatrao, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. V.V. Gangurde, APP for the respondent/State.

¶7

CORAM: REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED: 6^th June, 2019

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶10

By this application, the applicants seek pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. I-315 of 2018 registered with the Wada Police Station, Palghar, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Perused the papers. The incident is alleged to have been taken place on 9^th December, 2018 at about 10.30 a.m.. In all, there are about 11 accused. It is alleged that accused nos. 1 to 5 who were armed with iron rods and wooden sticks came where the development work was going on, threatened the J.C.B. operator

¶12

1 of 3

¶13

36.ABA186_2019.doc

¶14

and asked him to stop the work. It is alleged by the prosecution that when the complainant questioned them, accused no. 1 assaulted him with iron rod on his head and accused no. 2 assaulted him with an iron rod on his hand. It is alleged that when the complainant’s brother rushed to the spot, accused no. 3, who was armed with a wooden stick, assaulted the complainant’s brother on his head and that accused no. 4 also assaulted him on his hand.

¶15

As far as the applicants are concerned, no overt act is attributed to them in the said incident of assault. The applicants are students. Applicant no. 1 is a 3^rd year student of Engineering and Applicant no. 2 is a 3^rd year student of B.S.C. (Horticulture).

¶16

Learned APP also does not dispute the fact that no overt act has been attributed to the applicants in the said incident. The applicants have no antecedents.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed and the applicants are granted pre-arrest bail, on the following terms and conditions :

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicants be

¶20

2 of 3

¶21

36.ABA186_2019.doc

¶22

enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each, with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶23

(ii) The applicants shall inform their latest addresses and mobile contact numbers and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time, to the trial Court as well as to the concerned Police station, in writing.

¶24

(iii) The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence/contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

¶25

(iv) The applicants shall cooperate in the conduct of the trial.

¶26

The Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶27

It is made clear, that the observations made herein are prima facie and are confined to this application.

¶28

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶29

( REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

¶30

3 of 3

Darshan Ramesh Kasar and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Darshan Ramesh Kasar and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Ramvilas Gaud Vs the State of Maharashtra

Akshay Sanjay Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bhanubai Parashuram Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mahesh Bhika Choudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dhanpati Shyamlal Jaiswar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nadeem Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra